Log in

What will New Zealand look like in 2037?

Anyone who got to watch TV One’s What Next series last week (yes I’m a bit late) no doubt will have their own opinions about the programme. What interested me most was the discussion around the drivers (climate change, population change automation/technology, environment under immense pressure) for change and the possible/probable/preferred future for NZ in 2037 could/should look like for generations in the future.

public mediaNo surprises the ‘drop the mic’ opener touched on technological developments (billion-fold increase) that are already here and the influence that computers, robotics, computational processing and artificial intelligence will have on our future. Interestingly enough, 86% of voters during the programme thought technology would make our lives better/more prosperous, so long as we continue to address equity issues and don't 'leave people behind'. Coupled with this was the statement that our biggest fears about technology is the world being taken over by robots and more personally, robots taking our jobs. Not just menial type tasks, but jobs across the sector - anything that involves data analysis, applying physics and computational thinking where robots and AI can replace large numbers of workers. No surprises then, that the fastest growing jobs are actually in the technology sector.

Questions were asked like, what impact will this have on our children and their education and are we teaching kids the skills they need for the jobs we don’t even know they need yet?

What next screenshot

We’ve discussed this before in many of the threads in the VLN, so it’s comforting to know that we also agree that we want our kids to be flexible to be able to address problems, solve problems collaboratively and that kids learn differently now and filling heads up with ‘stuff’ and using memory-type learning tasks is losing impact on our learners. Assuming we agree, this means we can ensure; that we don’t carry on doing things because that’s the way we’ve always done things and now we’ve forgotten why we did it at all and we know that we're not powerless to change things at both the classroom and school-wide levels. We're confident that in our classrooms, learning opportunities are real, timely, authentic and sometimes-messy fusion of planned and responsive interventions, where technologies are used in an inclusive and ethical way. 

A new question was asked, should our children prepare for traditional or technology-based careers? 85% of those who voted overwhelmingly said technology-based, but were also mindful that technologies need to be accessible, otherwise people will be lost and left behind.

The programme ended by saying the greatest risk for us as New Zealanders, is sticking to the status quo rather than embracing change.  Which were you, the purple: we’re doing ok group or the orange: thinking outside the box/more interested in radical course correction kind of New Zealander? Or neither, it's just not that simple...

You might also like:


  • Tessa Gray (View all users posts) 28 Jun 2017 11:10am ()

    After all that great discussion about where we're heading in New Zealand, we get this announcement today from the government:

    Education Minister Nikki Kaye today announced an investment package of around $40 million over three years to enhance the digital fluency of our young people. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/40m-digital-fluency-package

    This is a substantial commitment to ensuring our young people are empowered and equipped to face an ever changing world when they leave school. Why?

    “To participate successfully in society and get the jobs and careers they want, our children will need to be confident users and creators of digital technologies.

    “Digital fluency is now an essential life skill for our young people, so we must ensure they have the skills and knowledge they need to engage in an increasingly digital world.” https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/40m-digital-fluency-package

    As previously noted in, Enabling e-Learning forum: Digital technologies in the national curriculum there are some challenges for teachers which have also been acknowledged in, NZTech Advance Education Technology Summit: Leading for 21st Century Learning such as resourcing, tools and teacher capability. This press release acknowledges the need for teacher support.

    What excites/interests/affects you most about this new direction in our education system?

  • Tessa Gray (View all users posts) 15 Aug 2017 2:13pm ()

    I have to agree with Allanah, the more community members like yourself share snippets from you own PLN David, the more we can broaden our own thinking. I also agree about coding being a tool/language/process, not a solution. 

    Artificial intelligence We still need all the other fields of jobs as know it, it's the new jobs we only imagine. The elephant in the room here is - how fast the tech industry is growing, where roles we originally thought could only be carried out by humans, even highly skilled ones like lawyers, are now being replaced by automation and artificial intelligence; hence the need for ever evolving transferable skills. 

    I wonder if we're having these conversations with our students too?

  • Tessa Gray (View all users posts) 16 Aug 2017 9:43am ()

    Beautifully said Justin! smiley

  • Tessa Gray (View all users posts) 16 Aug 2017 9:49am ()

    Every year CORE Education publishes a set of Ten Trends about digital technologies that are influencing aspects of education and every year there's new language in there for me to learn - this year it's Blockchain...You can download the PDF file to share.

    CORE's Ten Trends

    Could be something worth sharing with your students too Warren, and definitely teachers?

  • Tessa Gray (View all users posts) 01 Sep 2017 4:04pm ()

    Gotta love Twitter, check out this PDF document on thinking skills and approaches to learning. Thank you Suzanne Kitto (NZ teacher living in Vietnam). Is this something you could visualise or use in your classrooms?






  • Tessa Gray (View all users posts) 11 Sep 2017 1:00pm ()

    Thought I'd share this great video spotlighted by both Leigh Hynes and Jan-Marie Kellow - an interview with OECD’s Director for Education and Skills Andreas Schleicher published by Global Education & Skills Forum

    In this interview Andreas talks about preparing our students for the future - in terms of social and economic change. He says,

    Most important thing to do is NOT to think about tomorrow’s jobs. 

    He made the reference to teaching young children coding, and cautioned us to think about how rapidly things can change, including jobs and encouraged us to have an open mindset - for openness to new concepts and skills in learning. Bigger concepts/skills/processes like resilience, problem solving, collaborative learning need to be an important focus.

    The issues and challenges lie in conceptualising shared understandings for terms like creativity, resilience. For example, what is emotional intelligence? If we don’t break these down, and find 'common ground with these elements, they won’t become part of the daily teaching in innovative learning environments.

    As Jan-Marie Kellow writes,

    Schleicher went on to say that coding, for example, will look totally different when younger students leave school. This fits with my view that the coding itself is not the important part. The problem-solving and computational thinking will still be relevant, the ability to think logically, to break tasks down into parts and see patterns, to design solutions, to de-bug when things don't work and to re-design, these skills will still be useful and valuable. This is especially important to keep in mind as we consider the draft of the new Digital technologies area of the curriculum.

    What implications do these considerations have on what we teach, how much we teach and what we assess?

    **PISA is best known for globally publishing educational results from contributing OECD countries (including NZ)Find more about the OECD countries involved in the PISA assessment programme.

  • Tessa Gray (View all users posts) 11 Sep 2017 4:13pm ()

    Thanks Leigh, I appreciated you and Jan-Marie sharing this in the first place.

    There is a slight irony here if we're talking about alternative ways to assess and evaluate quality learning, when we're using our standardised data to compare our data with other countries, but I found it interesting in the end, when he said how some countries are using PISA results/themes to make shifts in the desired direction - ie: for some it means fewer hours of instruction, more focus on less areas etc.

    What could we collectively glean from our results do you think? Do you think we look good when in some aspects we're above the OECD average (some disparities in science)?

    Where do our future needs lie as a country? Is there a way to honor multiple perspectives - ie: bi-cultural partnerships and inclusive education for all?

Join this group to contribute to discussions.

e-Learning: Leadership

e-Learning: Leadership

Exploring leadership for change, vision, policy and strategy that integrates ICTs into learning.