Photo CC BY IvanWalsh.com
Next week, 18-24 June, is Gifted Awareness Week. It is a time to create awareness of all the different gifts and talents we value, and the variety of ways in which we can foster them, especially in the young. But who are we inviting to become aware of this?
The risk is that people who are already interested in gifted advocacy and education will network enthusiastically with one another, but go no further. Don't get me wrong on this - networking with other members of the gifted advocacy community is encouraging, challenging, and thoroughly worthwhile. Developing a personal learning network within the online gifted advocacy movement has been a very exciting development in my teaching. Like many teachers who specialise, I have been aware of my professional isolation at times; a situation that reduces opportunities for informed critique by peers just as certainly as it inhibits friendly interchanges, and the sharing of goals, resources, and the joy of our work. This has changed as my online networks have grown to augment the professional relationships I enjoy in real life. Whether we are involved in giftedness as gifted people, as parents, or as teachers, becoming aware of others who walk the same paths and making connections with them is valuable.
However, Gifted Awareness Week is about more than that. It is also an opportunity to create awareness of giftedness, and especially of the educational provisions that are needed to meet the needs of gifted and twice exceptional children, among those who do not routinely seek this information. Therefore, I ask you to do as many of these things as you can this Gifted Awareness Week:
Write to a Member of Parliament about the needs of gifted children as you see them. You may draw on the letter giftEDnz has sent, together with other groups, or the template letter they have created, or you may use your own words.
Contact a member of the news media about giftedness. Use social media, telephone, write letters, or talk to journalists in person.
Choose a blog post from the #NZGAW Blog Tour or an image from Gifted Education PhotoQuotes to share with one teacher who is not yet known for his or her involvement in gifted education and advocacy.
Try one of the suggestions on this list by GiftEDnz.
Please join us, and all of the other organizations who work together to support Gifted Awareness Week, in taking our message to the widest audience possible.
Photo CC BY-ND Neville10.
Mr Dunmill is the reason I became a teacher. He is also the reason I am the kind of teacher that I am today.
He is the teacher I remember with fondness - I can still see him at his desk, discussing a piece of writing with a student.
I visited him, unannounced, when he was a principal about to retire, to thank him for all he did for me. He is the only teacher I have ever visited.
He smiled, turned around, opened a filing cabinet and brought out a poem I had written about thirty years earlier.
We talked for a long time. He reminded me of events and achievements that I had long forgotten. What I hadn’t forgotten was how I felt when I was in his class. How he encouraged me and how he tried to make a misfit feel as if she did, in fact, belong.
I was so fortunate to have had this wonderful teacher for two years, both as a 7 year old and as a 12 year old.
How many teachers would have remembered so much about one of the many hundreds of children who had passed through their hands?
That he had kept a piece of my writing was such a huge and positive message.
I know there are many other adults and children who have been fortunate to have one, or more, of their own memorable extra-special teachers.
I hope that I have made a difference in the lives of some of those I have had in my care over the years and that there are people who regard me in a similar light.
What made Peter Dunmill so special and so effective as a teacher?
He was enthusiastic - he enjoyed teaching.
He was prepared. There was always ‘something extra’ for those who needed it. (Only now do I realise how much extra preparation was needed! A differentiated curriculum before differentiation was the ‘in’ word.)
He was flexible and creative.
He listened.
He communicated clearly and gave consistent messages.
He had expectations; set high, attainable goals. He explained.
He was available.
He made allowances, was patient and he persevered - especially with me - difficult as it must have been.
He motivated us.
He was both competent and confident.
He smiled a lot and used humour effectively.
He treated each pupil as an individual and worked with each on their strengths and their areas of weakness.
He was fair.
He was respectful.
He believed in me.
Gifted Awareness Week is a good time to reflect on the role of the teacher.
What do you regard as essential characteristics for a NZ teacher in 2012?
Are they the same list of characteristics that I observed in 1959 and 1964?
I realise that - as you are reading this - these are just eighteen words in bold. To me they ARE the person! They bring back memories of two years of special classroom experiences.
How can we ensure that those teaching our children are given the tools and the opportunities to enable them to become positively memorable to their students?
Teaching is so much more than imparting knowledge.
How can we ensure that our potential and current teachers are given opportunities to gain the skills that are needed to nurture as well as impart knowledge?
Gifted Awareness Week begins on 18 June, and the #NZGAW Blog Tour begins today. A blog tour connects readers and writers across the blogosphere with regards to a particular interest. In our case, that interest is gifted education and advocacy. Posts are varied in style, content, and philosophy of giftedness - you're bound to find something to agree with, and you'll probably find something to disagree with, too. The idea is to raise awareness, rather than to homogenise views.
Posts from giftEDnz board members will be shared on this blog. You can find out more about the blog tour, including how to join it, at http://creatingcurriculum.wordpress.com/2012/06/09/nzgaw-blog-tour-starts-monday/ or follow the tour from the growing list of posts at http://ultranet.giftededucation.org.nz/WebSpace/696/.
Posts on other blogs today include http://worldgifted2013.blogspot.co.nz/2012/06/something-to-smile-about.html and http://creatingcurriculum.wordpress.com/2012/06/11/needs-versus-merit-in-selection-for-gifted-programmes/.
We all have one. Mine was called “Mrs T.” Mrs T asked interesting questions, pushed the boundaries of our thinking, listened to and valued our opinions, and trusted us. She was witty and sharp, a ‘rule-breaker’, supplying us with contraband chewing gum and a couch to lounge on while we read George Orwell’s Animal Farm (not on the curriculum in Mississippi in the late 1970s). Mrs T gave us 35mm cameras, took us to the old town cemetery for a shoot and then gave us the school’s darkroom as our lab for creativity. She even had a computer in her classroom! Because of her, three high school female freshmen became good friends, and eventually the school’s newspaper editors, honour graduates, school leaders, and so on. Many memories were made.
And Mrs T, as it happened, was my favourite teacher. She remained my inspiration as I sat my final examination to be certified as a teacher and had to write about my philosophy of teaching. It wasn’t until I began my postgraduate studies that I came to realise that the class Mrs T was running was the school’s pull-out enrichment programme for gifted and talented students. I have often wondered … is it the principles and practices of ‘gifted education’ that make these memories so strong, or was it something about Mrs T?
It seems fitting during Gifted Awareness Week to think about and reflect upon how teachers affect the lives of their students. What influence do teachers have upon the hopes and aspirations of gifted and talented students? What knowledge, skills, and qualities are needed to work with gifted and talented students? We can turn to theory and research for lists of the characteristics of ‘teachers of the gifted’ – see for example, a blog by Carol Fertig which highlights a range of personal qualities, social skills, and intellectual abilities.
I am often asked … do you need to be gifted to teacher the gifted? Research conducted by Australian colleagues, Wilma Vialle and Siobhan Quigley, found that gifted students valued the personal-social qualities of teachers more highly than intellectual qualities; however these two sets of qualities were not that easily dichotomised. As these authors conclude, “…teachers’ personal qualities are inextricably linked with the teachers’ intellectual characteristics and their teaching strategies.” Not surprisingly, Vialle and Quigley recommend changes to teacher education, but also careful selection of teachers to ensure those of gifted students have enthusiasm for both the subjects and students they teach.
There are consistent calls in New Zealand’s research (e.g., Education Review Office’s 2008 report) for pre-service teacher education and ongoing professional learning and development. Gifted Awareness Week provides an opportunity to reflect upon our teacher education programmes. Is it still the case today of the “one-off” lecture or reading on giftedness and talent? How can we support our pre-service educators to ensure our teaching graduates are prepared for working with gifted students?
What opportunities are available for ongoing professional learning and development? (We can ask the same question in terms of the “one-off” pd day or workshop!) How can we ensure all teachers have opportunities for ongoing support as they work with gifted students? What advanced study should be facilitated and offered to those with responsibility, interests, or passions for gifted and talented education? How important is ‘informal’ relationship-building, networking and support for professional growth and development?
And then I wonder … did Mrs T need any sort of specialised professional development or advanced study as a teacher of the gifted … or was she simply a gifted teacher?
The Awards Ceremony for the International Finals was held in La Crosse Wisconsin overnight NZ time and I'm thrilled that NZ teams will be coming home with an amazing 13 trophies this year!!
There were several new countries competing this year so the standard is ramped up every year.
Junior Division Education - Oturu School -
2nd Junior Division Individual - Hamish Hall, Kerikeri Primary School 2nd!! (Hamish was our first every Individual Community Problem Solver!)
Middle Division Education - Mission heights Junior College - 1st!!
Scenario Writing: Middle Division - Daniel coats - Christchurch -
3rd Presentation of Action Plan: Junior Division - Nelson College -
5th Junior Division - Cobham Int - 1st!!
Senior Division - Nelson College - 3rd (There were NZ teams in all 3 finals of the Presentation of Action Plan)
Global Issues Problem Solving: Alternates - Cobham Intermediate -
2nd Middle Individual - Hugo Lawrence,
Nelson College - 3rd Junior Division - Selwyn House -
8th Junior Division - Cobham Intermediate -
5th Middle Division - Tauranga Boys/Girls -
6th Middle Division - Tauranga Boys/Girls - 1st!!!!!!!
Three first places and three 2nds is AMAZING! I'm very proud of them all!
http://fpsnz2011.wikispaces.com/ for more information about the Future Problem Solving programme
http://nymag.com/print/?/news/features/27840/
One of my wonderful Cluster Directors sent this link to me today (thanks Tracey). The article was written in 2007 and asks us to consider whether praise actually builds confidence in gifted children or in fact diminishes it. We all know gifted children who refuse to attempt tasks if there is any risk that they might fail, even if the failure is only in their own eyes.
Many of you will be familiar with the work of Carol Dweck and her work on the effect of praise on students in New York schools. Dweck concluded that praise can have the opposite effect to that intended and that we should be praising our children for the effort they expend to achieve success, rather than attribute their success to high ability or intelligence. Dweck found that children who think that innate intelligence is the key to success begin to discount the importance of effort. "I am smart, I don’t need to put out effort." Expending effort becomes stigmatized—it’s public proof that you can’t cut it on your natural gifts.
Check out the following youTube links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTXrV0_3UjY (the experiment) and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jDVd-nCEYc&feature=relmfu (interview with Carol Dweck).
My MEd research investigated the impact of strategy instruction combined with attribution retraining on gifted children who also experienced significant difficulties with some aspects of learning. One of the findings was that students felt more positive as learners when their success was attributed to effort plus the use of the strategy rather than to simply to their 'natural ability.'
• … it is Gifted Awareness Week from 13 to 19 June 2011?
• … gifted and talented children are found in all cultures, socioeconomic groups, and amongst those with disabilities?
• ... gifts and talents can be demonstrated in a wide range of intellectual, academic, creative, cultural, leadership, artistic, and physical abilities and qualities?
• … some children can be gifted and talented but also have learning or behavioural disabilities such as ADHD, Aspergers, dyslexia or dyspraxia?
• … all schools in New Zealand are required to identify and provide appropriately for gifted and
talented students under the National Administration Guidelines?
• … there are no explicit requirements for gifted and talented children in early childhood education to be identified or provided for appropriately?
• … only $1.2 million is allocated by Government for gifted and talented education this year? If 5%
of New Zealand’s school students are gifted and talented, this amounts to about $35 per child per
annum!
• … schools’ reporting for performance on National Standards to the Ministry of Education only
acknowledges those above the standard, but not well-above the standard?
• … gifted and talented students are not entitled to receive assessment and intervention services through Group Special Education?
• … the schools identified by ERO as providing most appropriately for gifted and talented students were those that had received significant professional learning support?
• … giftEDnz advocates for the needs of over 200 professionals working with gifted and talented
children, young people, and those who support them?
• … you can join giftEDnz, a professional association aiming for equitable opportunities and outcomes for gifted and talented children and young people through advocacy, communication, networking, and support?
I'm an analytical thinker so when I hear catch phrases such as 'personalising learning' or 'engagement' my brain begins the process of analysing the language, considering its colloquial and professional contexts, and wondering how it will be interpreted (and misinterpreted) by those on the receiving end of the communication. Most recently I've been thinking about the term 'meaningful learning' and what it means within a learning context. I asked a few students the question 'What is meaningful learning for you?' and received varied responses:
"Learning is meaningful if I'm interested in it. Sometimes I'm interested because it's something I want to know more about for its own sake and sometimes it's because it will lead to qualifications that I'm interested in gaining."
"Learning has meaning for me if it leads me to take action. Some learning seems to have more meaning for the teachers than for me but I have to do it anyway."
"Meaningful - mmm. What does THAT mean? I guess it would have to be real - I have to be able to see a fit between what I'm learning about and how I can apply it in real life."
"This has to be different for different people. I love Art and History so learning is meaningful when I'm involved in something related to these areas because it's important to who I am. It's also meaningful when it touches me personally and respects my culture because that's who I am."
Dr Judith Boettcher addresses the question of what constitutes meaningful learning in her paper entitled 'What is Meaningful Learning? From Bits and Bytes to Knowledge and Skills in 15 Weeks…'
She suggests some of the following definitions for meaningful learning.
Meaningful learning, in short, is learning that makes a difference—in one’s mind and in one’s life.
It would seem that Dr Boettcher and the students share similar ideas about what makes learning meaningful - what are your thoughts?
Have a look at my 2010 Social Sciences class (year 10) website for an example of inquiry-based learning leading to social action.